OK, so it starts out boring, and then goes absolutely nuts. Start reading the comments somewhere in the 90's and then work your way down, and behold the nuttiness that is the Nacle. That is the problem with these blog things, after awhile most people just stop paying attention, and then crazy stuff gets in. Where is the heavy hand of the Admin now?

So I received a personal revelation the other day that all Nacle participants need to stop reproducing entirely, because they neglect their children in favor of blogging. All of you need to get spayed or neutered, now. You can make up for the lack of mortal offspring in the afterlife.


Sarebear said... @ December 30, 2005 at 10:58 PM

You said "nuts". I therefore deem this post too sexual.

Begone, with you.


From someone officially a bit "nuts" herself.

The official euphemism is peaches.

Brings new meaning to my craving for Peaches 'n Cream Cobbler. YUM!

(Now headed towards the fruit in the fridge, NOT elsewhere you dirty-minded 'nacclers!)

Wait, I'm one of those . . . aw, nuts. Er, peaches . . . .

Kaimi said... @ December 31, 2005 at 12:38 PM

Snarkernackle (sic),

I am shocked and appalled that my sex post at T&S has not yet been snarked, despite the fact that (1) it is perfectly boring; (2) it has "Sex" in the title; (3) it is at T&S; and (4) it has now been online for nearly two days.

I am deeply disappointed in you snarkernackers. I would have thought that a blog run by Steve Evans, DKL, Naomi F., Allison, Christian, and Brian could do better.

I demand that my post be snarked forthwith. I also demand an explanation as to who dropped the ball on this one. Someone's head on a silver platter would be nice too.



Stephen said... @ December 31, 2005 at 2:54 PM

Err, Kaimi, it is one thing to be a bit of a Snark fan, another to start demanding heads on platters ...

Stephen said... @ December 31, 2005 at 2:55 PM

Oh, and as you may have guessed, bcc has kind of taken over your snark space:


annegb said... @ January 1, 2006 at 10:23 AM

Sarebear, laughing out loud. This has all gone nuts.

Kaimi, not sure exactly what snarking is, but it's hard to snark (as I see it) when you are so funny. Dude, you have been a regular Chris Rock around here lately.

Stephen said... @ January 1, 2006 at 11:21 AM

BTW, why did I first run across this on a non-LDS newsletter?

Most surprising to me was the Polyglot Bible -- on a link from the page above, or you can go directly to http://davies_linguistics.byu.edu/polyglot for it. It's described as "A parallel corpus of the entire Gospel of Luke in 30 languages, allowing full text searching and side by side comparison of up to seven languages. Contains Middle and Old English versions of the Bible." I tried this to make certain that it worked, and was impressed; it's a bit complicated, but it works quickly and does everything promised. There is also a link on the page to the Polyglot Book of Mormon, which is set up the same way.

Snarkimus Prime said... @ January 2, 2006 at 6:49 AM


In addition to being the "Hotheaded Hawiian" I also now dub you "Mr. BossyPants" and you will only get snarked at my whim and not at your demand. So there.


The SnarkerNacle is not a place for you to post whatever you feel like. Stop posting wierd irrelevant crap, your comments will be deleted indescriminantly.

annegb said... @ January 2, 2006 at 9:27 AM

I thought snarking was saying whatever you wanted.

I want to be a snarker. I think it is my calling. I can write snotty. How do you do it?

Crystal said... @ January 2, 2006 at 10:32 AM

Hey, there's lots of Sex in the Larry King thread over at BCC.

It seems quite fitting, actually.

Kaimi said... @ January 2, 2006 at 12:13 PM

Snarker (sic),

Thank you for a nickname that I will cherish and treasure and wear every week like a Young Womens medallion.

However, if you're going to confirm AnonyGeorge's title, you could at least break out a dictionary and try to spell it right. Few people can get away with the misspelling tic.

Snarkimus Prime said... @ January 2, 2006 at 12:23 PM


If all you can dew is make phun of myspellings, then you got nothin.

john scherer said... @ January 3, 2006 at 7:07 AM

Stephen = Snarker????

Post a Comment