Steve, the stoned kid who took time off from college to film the nonsense over Michael Moore's visit to UVSC, wants the Nacle to know his DVD is out and about. So much so he even wants the Snarkernacle to promote it with the silly title of "Michael Moore comes to Utah, Mormons try to kill him..." in a private e-mail. Mormons try to kill him? Hmmmm. I must have missed that one. Check out their blog,which pretty much has nothing to do with their film, to see where he and his pals are coming from. Politically neutral? Objective indy film making? Yup. All the way. Most of the garbage on their blog is by someone other than the film maker, but these gems are by the film maker. I don't know about you, but I just lost interest in seeing his film.
Thx to self-promoting e-mail tipster.
Snarked by
Response to Jodi Stoddard
10 comments
Oh no!!!!11 A liberal-minded, film maker with his own sense of snark! Run away!!
Own sense of snark? Whatever. How about his own sense of self-importance?
I am one of the filmmakers. I write most of the blog. I'm assistant director and I've been doing tons of the publicity and marketing.
I want to apologize for our zeal, but we're starving liberal artists and do what we must to do what we think will get the most attention.
Thanks for the link though.
God bless you all.
Thanks for the free publicity!
But, seriously, next time my sarcasm and apparant success makes you angry, just pop in a Janice Kapp Perry album and all your cares will...float...away...
Again, thanks for the link! The irony is thick.
We've gotten almost 75 hits on our BLOG from your link! Way to go!
Hey, glad to be of service guys. But, you still need to work on your snarking, because its weak!
This is actually a real comment: Why is the post about Steve's dad being hateful and intolerant on the list of sarcastic gems proving, in your opinion his idiocy?
I don't get it. The others I understand, but tolerance, I thought, was a bi-partisan thing...
Steven's post about his dad is snark-worthy because he is ridiculing his own father in public. Most people, I think, find that extremely distasteful.
Okay. That's actually a reasonable response.
I thought it was because Steve was shining a light on intolerance and the author of the post was, himself, intolerant of Steve's lack of tolerance of intolerance...
What?
Um, yeah, what you both said.
Oh, and Steve, just to add a snark for good measure: how "apparant[ly] success[ful]" can you be that you find 75 hits from an obscure blog a great thing? I also noticed that neither you or your pals denied you being "stoned". If you layed off the bong guys, you might not be "starving liberal artists". Spending all your profits on dope isn't a good investment strategy. Smooooooke on the waaaaater, the fire in the sky!
Post a Comment