| 13 comments ]

Mormon Mommy Wars is irritated that they aren't edgy, even though they don't know what "edgy" means. I mean, they aren't supposed to be edgy, right? Um, OK. But, wait, they do want to be edgy and talk about bewbs after all, so I guess they are edgy, but have they figured out what "edgy" is yet? Apparently not, but they decided they definitely do want to talk about bewbies, so natch, Kaimi joins in, since you cannot discuss bewbs on the Nacle and not have Kaimi's interest.

(Tip for all Nacle Noobs, and Crystal and Stephen-ethesis: If you want to get linked on the T&S sidebar and have Kaimi comment on your blog, discuss bewbs)

Oh, and Heather doesn't like the Snarker. Boo hoo. I guess its because we make fun of her husband. Oh well. And, revelations upon revelations (see the comments under her MMW post, the one attempting to be amusing) emanate from the Heather O., the "O" must stand for "Oracle" and not "Wife of Nate Oman". Like most self-appointed Oracles, lets see how Heather does (her oracular predictions in bold):

Again, proof positive that he is definitely, without question, a man. Wrong, three to one.

Without kids. Wrong, three times over.

Who is certainly uncompassionate. Wrong. Heather is just bitter that we poke fun at her hubby, who actively solicits us to poke fun at him, but we are going to ignore him, because he needs to be spending his time training and not blogging. Call us compassionate.

And single. Wrong, three to one.

And hating it. Majority not single, so cannot be hating it. And the one single is in a happy, healthy committed relationship.

Taking his frustrations out on simple, suburban housewives who are just trying to have some fun. Right on you being "simple, suburban housewives", wrong on taking out frustrations. You goofballs are posting to the Nacle, so you are fair game, and you are deliberately baiting the Snarker, so you are asking for trouble. The Snarker has largely ignored you, because you are pretty boring and not snarkworthy, and only passingly commented on you when commenting primarily on CftT. Stick your neck out, girl, and its going to get chopped.

Fun he is not getting. Definitely not getting any. Fun, I mean. Wrong, on all counts.

OK, so this is just a revenge post on Heather's part. Got it. Next up from MMW: Why Heather Hates SnarkerNacle: Because My Husband is So Kewl! Now with more new Jello Salad and Tuna Fish Casarole Recipes, right after this commercial target marketed at simple, suburban housewives who blog on the Nacle!

13 comments

Anonymous said... @ January 18, 2006 at 9:01 AM

Snarking has it's place. This post seems to be promulgating a bitterness that I doubt even you four want to see in the 'naccle.

I'm not a blogger, or even a frequent poster. For the most part I like your material.

My dad used to make me and my brothers recite as follows "Do not initiate, do not escalate."

Response to Jodi Stoddard said... @ January 18, 2006 at 9:02 AM

Awww, shucks. We're sorry. OK, we won't do it again.

Mika said... @ January 18, 2006 at 9:16 AM

LOL!! Obviously some people don't have a sense of humor. Sad really.

Heather O. said... @ January 18, 2006 at 10:52 AM

My husband IS kewl.

Thanks for the traffic.

Heather O. said... @ January 18, 2006 at 10:55 AM

Oh, and clearly whatever you are getting must not be very good. Why then all the bitterness?

NFlanders said... @ January 18, 2006 at 11:31 AM

Good call on Kaimi. He is totally the Bloggernacle HornDog.

Response to Jodi Stoddard said... @ January 18, 2006 at 11:39 AM

Heather, in a slow blogging day, you have to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. Maybe if your kewl husband was still blogging at T&S we wouldn't have to resort to the slim pickens at MMW. Besides, Heather, really, nobody was even talking about you, MMW got mentioned as a side comment on a post about TftC. You are the one who decided to lash out over nothing. So who is bitter and uptight, hun? Had you not flailed wildly, MMW would have remained unsnarked. So, wah.

Heather O. said... @ January 18, 2006 at 3:33 PM

So, three married chicks and something else, huh? The defensiveness should have given it away. Seems like you can dish it out, but just can't take it. Wow. Disappointing, really.

Response to Jodi Stoddard said... @ January 18, 2006 at 3:38 PM

Heather, give it up. You are the one who made something out of nothing. Go make some Jello salad and ponder deep thoughts with Nate. If you don't like Snarkernacle, then don't read Snarkernacle. Its just that easy.

Heather O. said... @ January 18, 2006 at 5:02 PM

Ah, but where would you be if nobody read or cared about you, Snarker? You can only snark if people give a rat's behind, and don't pretend you won't do what it takes to make people notice you. It's not becoming to pretend you're not that shallow.

Stephen said... @ January 18, 2006 at 9:48 PM

Actually, I'm linked on from T&S. My complaints have always been I could not get a link from BCC.

The link comments are the reason I thought you were the missing BCC blogger ...

You are slowly becoming the king of the nacle though ...

You ought to sign up with sitemeter. It is free (even if it misses a lot of visits that referrer logs display), but fun.

Then you can check traffic like I do at http://www.truthlaidbear.com/showdetails.php?host=http://ethesis.blogspot.com

Is it me, or do some of the posts here seem to be computer generated gibberish? (the comments, not the snarks).

Heather O. said... @ January 19, 2006 at 5:42 AM

Wow, you really cleaned up the comments, eh? Too bad. Lanuatraon had some of the best stuff I've ever read!

Response to Jodi Stoddard said... @ January 19, 2006 at 7:40 AM

Languatron is a nutter who has flailed the Nacle before, notably at T&S. I tolerated him for one day, and that is it. If you want to see more of his antics, just go to google and do a search on "languatron".

Post a Comment