Okay, we’ve all heard of By Common Consent, which is just another name for "Contention is of the Devil". This blog is attributed to active LDS Church members allegedly in good standing, but I suspect someone somewhere is writing an article to be published by FARMS demonstrating that DNA found on keyboards shows that BCC is in fact not written by members of the LDS Church at all, thereby letting the Church off the hook. But, for argument’s sake, let’s assume they are active LDS members in good standing. If so, then why does BCC quote from so many non-LDS skeptical sources that are hostile to the LDS Church?
I mean, they frequently quote from the LDS Scriptures and talk about Joseph being a Prophet, but they also constantly question him, his teachings, his legitimacy, his legacy and those who fail to view him with a critical eye.
I’m stumped here. Is it a blog about the inspired, just not an inspired blog?
I’ve also uncovered another scandal-these people consider themselves "Liahoners" and not "Iron Rodders"! In other words, they don't hold on to the word of God! Like that wasn't totally obviously.
I’m also writing today to SLC asking that they strike the phrase "by common consent" from all CES correlated texts so no non-member will mistake this blog as being LDS Church affilliated. Please join me in my letter campaign.
Snarked by
Response to Jodi Stoddard
4 comments
Is it a blog about the inspired, just not an inspired blog.
Wow! Chiasm in the snarkernacle! My testimony grows!
Come-on, get real, BCC is so PC and orthodox. Yeah, BKP wouldn't feel at home there, but were would he feel at home?
Aaron, you're just bitter that the Nacle has given Prudence the thumbs down and the Snarker the thumbs up.
You are right though, BCC cannot be brought down by the likes of me. It will be brought down by the likes of you.
Oh cool, Aaron B, is having another conversation with himself. It's like Prudence all over again.
Post a Comment