| 9 comments ]



The latest Blahhhrrgernacle addition is:

Sick & Tired (S&T)

CREDO: This new blog is going to cut to the chase and eliminate the fore and middle ground of blog evolution by:



1) Recycling old posts

2) Having a lot of permabloggers who either don't post or rarely post

3) Have high turnover guest bloggers, not allowing them to stay too long so as to add to the volume but not be permitted to eclipse the permabloggers

4) Have more permanent bloggers leave than join

5) Praise malcontents

6) Get more hits from google and yahoo searches than from Naccle readers

In short, S&T is going to beat the Old Blogs at their own game. A sure-fire recipe for senescence and rapid deterioration!


9 comments

Anonymous said... @ August 22, 2006 at 1:15 PM

Who is she? She's cute! More pictures of the hot brunette, please.

I have no idea what yo9ur post was about. But with ilustrations like that who cares?

Anonymous said... @ August 22, 2006 at 1:18 PM

Ooh. I found another picutre of her. http://health.howstuffworks.com/pms.htm

Fetch, she's hot.

Anonymous said... @ August 22, 2006 at 1:27 PM

"2) Having a lot of permabloggers who either don't post or rarely post."

http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?author=81
http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?author=75
http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?author=92


"3) Have high turnover guest bloggers, not allowing them to stay too long so as to add to the volume but not be permitted to eclipse the permabloggers

4) Have more permanent bloggers leave than join"

http://www.bycommonconsent.com/author-list/
http://www.bycommonconsent.com/about-bcc/

Anonymous said... @ August 22, 2006 at 1:55 PM

I have a better Idea, how about a LDS blogger death match between T&S and BCC. Sometimes I wonder if the snarkernacle is just the opportunity for the two to snipe back and forth.

Anonymous said... @ August 22, 2006 at 2:04 PM

but of course snarkernacle is unbiased in its snarking. equal opportunity. t&s and bcc.

Response to Jodi Stoddard said... @ August 22, 2006 at 3:03 PM

Dear Kaimi...I mean..you anonymous T&Stard,

If you look through the archives, you will see that BCC gets hit quite a lot. If T&S wasn't a pool of swill, it wouldn't be such a great target. Seriously, what blog (shall we compare BCC?) recycles its own posts "from the archives" with such frequency? I bet if you added up all of the other blogs in the entire Nacle who post "from the archives" it still wouldn't add up to what Turds & Squeezins posts "from the barfhives".

Anonymous said... @ August 22, 2006 at 3:16 PM

If all T&S can do in their own defense is cast mud on BCC, then that is effectively an admission of guilt on their part.

Anonymous said... @ August 22, 2006 at 3:26 PM

perhaps not a mud throw at bcc but a pointing out that bloggers who don't post - um, they exst everywhere. ever read m*? fmh? nine moons? roxy?

t&s has some perms who don't blog much. yawn. so does everyone else.

Response to Jodi Stoddard said... @ August 22, 2006 at 3:47 PM

m*? fmh? nine moons? roxy?

Nope, never even heard of them. Which would explain why they all get snarked.

OK, so all overblown old blogs have dead wood among their ranks. OK, so that is #2. How about #1, 3, 4, 5, and 6?

Post a Comment