If we had said the "F" in FMH stood for "filth", there would have been an uproar. But, if Sunstone says it, then it is OK. More than OK, it is welcome, and the idea FMH is rated "G" is spurned! How dare they rate us "G"! So they backlink to the infamous Sex Post to prove they are not "G." Congratulations, girls, you are more like Ezekiel 23 than Isaiah 52.
Snarked by
Response to Jodi Stoddard
6 comments
Ahem. Re-read the comic. The woman thinks it is filth and then discovers it's not what she thought it was (i.e., not filth).
Why do you have such a vendetta against FMH? This "snark" on them isn't even funny. It's just mean, judgmental, and petty. At least FMH can laugh at themselves.
fido,
The point is the ensuing discussion in the comments it over the "G" rating, which the permas then argue against by discussing Artemis' infamous Sex Talk post, which is the kind of filth the woman in the cartoon is talking about. So, in other words, it is filth.
FMH is a roller coaster of quality that is ripe for snarking, and their readership consists of a lot of bitter Mormons and ex-mormons, so they get snarked.
Snarks do not have to be funny. Look up "snark" on urbandictionary.com
I must admit that sometimes I do feel guilty for snarking FHM. The reason for my guilt? Its just too friggin' easy.
Request:
Please list all of the rules for snarking so we have reasonable expectations. Thank you.
rules? rules? there ain't no rules in vendettas. just mean, judgmental, and petty posts. therein lie your expectations--reasonable or not
OK, thanks, "no name" Kaimi. It is not about "vendettas", as has been explained to you repeatedly. But, it would be too much to expect you to take responsibility for your actions, so you have to keep beating that drum.
It is mostly about bad behavior, and sometimes just about making silly jokes. The constant stupid fighting between BCC and T&S and the constant prurient posts at FMH are good examples of bad behavior, so they get snarked. The pokes at danithew's pictures are examples of silly jokes.
We here at SnarkerNacle provide negative feedback to the Bloggernacle. The kind of negative feedback bloggers would not tolerate on their own blogs, so they would delete the negative comments and ban the comment makers. Blogging is all about ego, and there are a lot of egotists in the Bloggernacle who think they should be allowed to do anything they like and only be praised and never be questioned or criticized. These are the kind of people who whinge about SnarkerNacle being all about vendettas, when it is all about their bad behavior.
Post a Comment