Oh, no, not again. Yes, let us all once again rehash whether or not Mormons are Christians. Ugh. Over at BCC, they talk some about who owns the definition, which gets to the core of the controversy. But, like a blind batter wildly swinging at anything coming across the plate, they continue to miss the obvious definition. But, hey, why bother to check in with Jesus on something like this? Not like he would have anything to say on the matter.
Bloggernacle meets reality.
General Nacle Authorities
Blogs Terrestrial
Blogs Telestial
Outer Blogness
Snark Mountain Archives
- January 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (1)
- November 2009 (8)
- October 2009 (5)
- September 2009 (5)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (3)
- May 2008 (3)
- April 2008 (4)
- March 2008 (3)
- February 2008 (3)
- January 2008 (5)
- December 2007 (6)
- November 2007 (5)
- October 2007 (10)
- September 2007 (10)
- August 2007 (17)
- July 2007 (18)
- June 2007 (11)
- May 2007 (20)
- April 2007 (20)
- March 2007 (13)
- February 2007 (11)
- January 2007 (12)
- December 2006 (17)
- November 2006 (15)
- October 2006 (18)
- September 2006 (18)
- August 2006 (20)
- July 2006 (17)
- June 2006 (19)
- May 2006 (30)
- April 2006 (29)
- March 2006 (56)
- February 2006 (56)
- January 2006 (66)
- December 2005 (54)
- November 2005 (49)
- October 2005 (54)
- September 2005 (5)
3 comments
And the disciples were called Christians ...
Why call ye me Lord, Lord ...
Problem is, christian means something a bit more today than what Jesus originally meant.
it appears the might snarkers have missed the whole point of my post. i wasn't trying to define it (over on fmh), i wanted to know why we don't say we are Christian, since we do in fact follow Christ. however, in true bloggernacle style, it was threadjacked into what the word meant, instead of why we are so afraid to call ourselves by that word.
Post a Comment