| 10 comments ]

File under: Ugly infighting

...to be scourged by faggots.

Adam Greenwood, pillar of exalted virtues, is not content to castigate the Nacle in general and his fellow permabores in specific with attempts to corral them with his righteous platitudes. No. He also has to point out to everyone that while he may be mean, critical, and hurtful to people’s feelings, so was Abinadi, so that makes it OK.

Some take him to task for his rather self-serving likening of the scriptures unto himself, but he ignores this based on the lack of ontological differences between God, prophets and himself. Anger is OK for Adam too, even though it really isn't. I don't know about you, but I have a tough time seeing GBH (or any other ancient or modern prophet) yelling at someone, frothing at the mouth the way Adam surely does. I guess that isn't an "ontological difference".

And, so, gentle readers, it looks like some behind the scenes contention there at T&S has resulted in Adam discovering he is cut from the same cloth as Abinadi and has spilled out into the public side of the Nacle with KHH and Kaimi kicking him in the shins over it (if anyone has any inside dirt, send it to snarkernacle@yahoo.ca). Shouldn't be too long before the other permabores roast Abinadam on the bonfire of their virtual vanities and then start in on each other.

Marshmallows anyone?

10 comments

Anonymous said... @ June 28, 2006 at 7:10 PM

Please, show the man some grace.

Perhaps ("perhaps" because there are many alternatives, choose which) one of the more annoying gizmos of being Alpha-the-Twig-Green is his belief that he is a great writer, Browning, Shakespeare and Borges all stuffed into a lovely burrito ("Please, served with that Green sauce of Wooden vitriol, only masculine Mormonism for me, and heavy on the relish, are you listening?"), while showing us that he failed basic grammer.

Challenge: Scan the history of his posts and count the grammatical "idiosyncrasies." First to a million wins.

Anonymous said... @ June 28, 2006 at 8:20 PM

Dear Anonymous,

WTF?

Sincerely,
Anonymous 2

Anonymous said... @ June 28, 2006 at 11:47 PM

Dear Anonymous 2,

I think Anonymous has been smoking the longbottom leaf with Kimball Hunt. Just a theory.

Sincerely,

Anonymous 3

Anonymous said... @ June 29, 2006 at 7:10 AM

Dear anonymi,
Pass the dutchie from the left-hand side

Anonymous said... @ June 29, 2006 at 7:12 AM

Anonymous 1,
"grammer"? Oops! Nothing worse than screwing up basic spelling when castigating someone else's basic grammAr. :^)

Anonymous said... @ June 29, 2006 at 12:08 PM

Anonymous 5,

That's called a typo, obvious given the spelling of "grammatical" which follows. Typos are not basic grammetical (oops, typo, grammatical) errors.

Anonymous said... @ June 29, 2006 at 3:35 PM

Ahh, motes and beams anonymous, motes and beams.

Anonymous said... @ June 29, 2006 at 4:15 PM

typocrite
(noun)
One who tries to pass off his or her spelling errors as "typos"

Anonymous said... @ June 29, 2006 at 5:55 PM

"That's called a typo, obvious given the spelling of "grammatical" which follows." Even mor eironic than the misspelling of grammar is the grammatical error in the preceding sentence. The sentence is in need of a verb to support the second clause. The adjective "obvious" is made to do the work of both adjective and verb.

Anonymous said... @ June 29, 2006 at 6:05 PM

Do you understand nominative absolute?

Post a Comment