fmhLisa has at least three surefire ways to drive traffic to her blog. She knows any post mentioning sex, women holding the priesthood, or polygamy will instantly raise her SiteMeter stats. Her latest Wild Speculation post goes two for three there, but her last paragraph puts the “wild” in her speculation.

I quote, lest you think I’m making this up:

And Finally, this is the “wild speculation about mysterious ways” part, could it be that polygamy was less about polygamy (and much less about dynastic polygyny) than about blowing minds and hearts wide open enough to ask questions and receive answers about the divine feminine? (Emphasis Added)
She then puts that question to the assembled FMH’ers for discussion – with very few exceptions the comments do little to raise the level of dialog.

I don’t know about you, but just reading fmhLisa’s wild speculation gets me all verklempt.

Talk amongst yourselves.


Anonymous said... @ July 11, 2007 at 4:36 AM

At what point will Lisa say to herself, "No, I will not post this, it is just too absurd, too over-the-top"? I do not understand how anyone can sit there and even consider such nonsense with a straight face.

Post a Comment