| 8 comments ]

My Very Dear Ms. Parshall,

Whilst I appreciate your esteemed and constant love, I hasten to bring some points to your attention that might serve to illuminate this recondite matter of ass kissing.

Now, firstly, Ms. Parshall, permit me to digress for one moment to address matters pertaining to polity. Owing to your apparent expertise in matters of history, one might have assumed one of such experience would do the research to place such statements into their appropriate historical context, so as not to cast them into a modern light, which light might place them in an unflattering position, and seemingly grant license to those looking to excuse themselves in sin. As such is the case, I would hasten to encourage one such as you to more fully practice their art with greater wisdom and skill, so one might be a servant of the public, and not a detriment thereunto.

Returning to the subject at hand, I would turn your mind about to a thing called the osculum infame. This thing is in reference to an ancient and evil practice of commiting oneself to the devil via a rather unpleasant and shameful act whereupon one enters into his community by ingratiatingly placing one's mouth upon his posterior in a vile and unseemly way, which is then followed by the licentious ritual of adulterous orgy with the evil community, then ultimately consumated with the Black Mass, a flagrant mockery of the Lord's Supper.

The etymology of this ancient phrase, which dates as far back 1303, is such that "kiss my ass" is meant to imply the one you are speaking to has already performed the osculum infame, meaning they are in league with the devil, and so they are as one who does such things as far as you are concerned.

This was the meaning intended in my quotation you have publicized, Ms. Parshall. Namely that our critics, who lie with deceitful tongues and defame us far and wide and appeal to the corrupt politicians who neither protect but only persecute us, are in the Devil's own house, and thus they are damned with him.

I expect no apology from you, but would appreciate you take this small lesson to heart and mind in the future so that you might understand that I had no intention of being profance and vulgar, and thereby offer a bad example to the Saints, but was correctly identifying the damned state of those heretics who would lie and persecute us with no cause, whom the Justice of the Lord will condemn. Worlds without end.

Thx anon submitter

8 comments

Anonymous said... @ March 6, 2007 at 8:12 AM

anon submitter my @$$. That was written by the Liverpool Wollyback in Brigham Young's court. Is there anybody else who says Whilst?

Snarkimus Prime said... @ March 6, 2007 at 8:23 AM

Actually, no, it was not written by Ronan. Thanks for your insighful commentary though.

The Wiz said... @ March 6, 2007 at 10:14 AM

Shouldn't it be worlds withOUT end?

Snarkimus Prime said... @ March 6, 2007 at 10:36 AM

ooops

The Wiz said... @ March 6, 2007 at 10:39 AM

Oh, it's been edited now so my comment makes no sense. I'm OK with that.

Snarkimus Prime said... @ March 6, 2007 at 11:18 AM

Edited it because of your comment. Should be obvious from your comment what was edited.

Anonymous said... @ March 7, 2007 at 5:46 PM

Congratulation on being voted worst thing about the 'Nacle in 2006!

I think that deserves a post of some sort. Mainly about how the rest of the 'Nacle can't quite take any criticism.

Jack "Marlboro Man" Mormon said... @ March 8, 2007 at 11:56 AM

Hmmm..could that anonymous submitter be Mark Butler? Did he not claim that he was a prophit?

Oh, well, I can see that Snarkimus Prime is competeting with Mr. DamnedKingLandrith for most revild of the 'Naccleites with winning the worst of the 'Nacle niblet.

Congratulations, Snarkimus? When may we expect to read your acceptance speech? Or are you still eschewing narcissism? I know how humble you really are. Narcissism is such an ugly thing, huh?

Post a Comment